Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Web Conference on Saturday February 04, 2012 at 9 AM

This was my second web conference. It was very informative. Everyone introduced themselves and talked about their assignment in the school they work at. Dr. Attaway and Dr. Abernathy gave answers to everybody's questions. They also emphasized watching the review videos for LCE as they were outstanding and would help us score high. Someone also posted the link to it so that was helpful. A website named e-pals was mentioned, where students could e-mail and communicate with other students around the world. I also got information on applying for grants from "Donors Choose." We were also advised to choose a field supervisor and mostly everyone was surprised as we were not aware of it. So overall, these web conferences are a way to find answers to all your queries. The two professors are very kind and helpful.

Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Technology Action Plan


According to the STaR chart, the Infrastructure for Technology is our biggest strength. Educator Preparation & Development is one of our weak areas. Only 40% of our educators meet SBEC standards. Although our administrators expect teachers to use technology, some veteran teachers are hesitant and still not comfortable using the smart board, document readers etc.
Teaching & Learning is another weak area. Instruction is teacher directed and students regularly use technology on an individual basis to access electronic information and develop communication and presentation projects. But this takes place mostly in upper grades. In lower grades computer use is limited to skill and drill software.
The level of technology knowledge base of our teachers is varied; therefore it is important to address everyone’s needs and the answer is to create differentiated staff development training. Based on the STaR chart data and some needs that have been identified in the Campus Improvement Plan, I have come up with a staff development plan to help meet technology needs at our campus.


Professional Development Activities/Strategies
Person(s) Responsible
Technology/ Resources/Data
Timeline
Improve achievement in Elementary math by integrating new technology into the Curriculum
Curriculum Coaches, Classroom Teachers, Instructional Specialists
Fact Fluency Technology, ST Math
Feb 2012-May 2013
Training to utilize supplemental resources as Interactive technology to help gain student mastery
Teachers
Quizdom
Gizmo
Pebble Go
May 2012-May 2013
Create interactive lessons for Qwizdom and Smartboard to enrich classroom experience
Classroom Teachers, Instructional Specialists
Smartboard and Qwizdom software
May 2012-May 2013
Create a presentation to familiarize parents with science expectations
All Science teachers
Powerpoint
May 2012-May 2013
KidBiz Training to increase usage and proficiency of use
Classroom Teachers, Instructional Specialists,
District Support Team
Achieve 3000 software and Training
May 2012-May 2013
Train to implement reading intervention for students with special needs
Special Education Teachers
District Support Team
System 44 materials
May 2012-May 2013
Train teachers on i-Station, a computer program for struggling readers in Grades K-2
Classroom Teachers
Special Education Teachers
District Support Team
I-Station Software
May 2012-May 2013
Workshop to train teachers on the use of READ 180 for 5th SEI, struggling learners and appropriate Spec. Ed students
Classroom Teachers
Special Education Teachers
District Support Team
READ 180
May 2012-May 2013
Utilize Distance Learning opportunities
Classroom Teachers, Instructional Specialists,
District Support Team
TV
Computer
Smart board
May 2012-May 2013
Use i-explore training for grades and lesson plans
Classroom Teachers, Instructional Specialists,
District Support Team

computer
May 2012-May 2013
Create and use web-based, TEKS-based lessons, digital portfolios and wikis in the classroom.
Classroom Teachers, Instructional Specialists,
District Support Team
computer
May 2012-May 2013

Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Educator Preparation and Development

Educator Preparation and Development

 Educator Preparation and Development is one of the areas of the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology, 2006-2020. All these areas were developed to promote academic excellence. According to this plan, all educators:
  • graduate from an educator preparation program that models current technology in instructional and administrative practices PreK-12.
  • exit educator preparation programs knowing how to use technology effectively in the teaching and learning process.
  • develop new learning environments that utilize technology as a flexible tool where learning is colloborative, interactive and customized.
  • ensure integration of appropriate technology throughout all of curriculum and instruction.


"In the past few years the preservice teacher education programs have made substantial progress in preparing future teachers in information technology," says Dr. David Moursund, Executive Officer of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE), "but they still have a long way to go."
"It takes a great deal of education and experience to achieve a comfortable level of expertise in this field," says Dr. Lynne Schrum, president of ISTE. "We want preservice teachers to learn how to use information technology as a tool for helping their students learn."
Survey researchers also asked about the field experiences of teachers — whether or not information technology was available in the K-12 classrooms where preservice teachers get their field training. They found that most of those classrooms have information technology available, but student-teachers do not routinely use that technology during their field experience.
"The use of technology in everyday classroom and practicum experiences — seems to be more important than specific computer classes," says Talbot Bielefeldt, a researcher for the survey. "Specific technology training has a role, but only up to a point. The institutions that reported the highest levels of student technology skills and experience were not those with heavy computer course requirements, but those that made use of technology on a routine basis throughout the teacher training program." observes Bielefeldt.
Says Lemke, "The findings in this report should be a wake-up call for higher education institutions and policymakers across the country — today’s students live in a global, knowledge-based age, and they deserve teachers whose practice embraces the best that technology can bring to learning." Top of Form
The article that I quoted in this piece sums it correctly—our students deserve tech savvy teachers.  
Bottom of Form
In the 21st century when the students are so tech savvy, educators should be competent in new ways to teach. The instructional strategies should be based on current research and engaging for students. We need to have assessments that effectively measure what students are learning. We need to give students the knowledge, skills, and tools they need when they graduate from high school. To do that, we need to emphasize technology infusion to transform our teaching and learning.
On our campus, educator preparation is still in the developing level. Teachers use technology for administrative tasks and classroom management. There is use of online resources. 40% of educators meet SBEC standards. Administrators expect teachers to use technology. 6-24% of technology budget is allocated for professional development. Some teachers use smart boards, and document readers.